01Unstructured evidence
Screenshots, PDFs, CSV exports, and zip files arrive without a usable case narrative.
Built for litigation teams handling digital evidence
Prepare digital evidence for court with review-ready structure
Turn screenshots, exports, reports, and intake notes into chronologies, gap reports, and draft work product your attorneys can actually evaluate before they use it.
No credit card required · 14-day free trial
Attorney-review workflow
No AI training on customer matter data
Trust center with security and retention details
Matter Workspace
Johnson v. North Ridge Systems
Draft chronology assembled from exports, screenshots, and intake notes
Attorney review required
Chronology
3 high-confidence eventsMar 12, 2026 · 8:41 PM
Instagram message sent to client
Source: exported messages file, explicit timestamp captured.
Mar 13, 2026 · 9:18 AM
Screenshot forwarded to counsel
Source: email thread and intake note alignment.
Audit trail
Chronology generated11:09 AM
Gap report flagged for review11:14 AM
Gap Analysis
Missing device export for March 12-15 window
Intake suggests a second phone existed, but no extraction or export is attached to the matter.
Draft Output
Preservation letter ready for counsel revision
Generated from known custodians, platforms, and timeline gaps already captured in the matter.
Why Teams Stall
Digital evidence gets messy long before the attorney sees it.
Litigation teams are expected to move quickly, but the underlying evidence rarely arrives in a format that supports clean chronology work, early issue spotting, or consistent prep.
What That Creates
Chronology drafts start later than they should.
Missing devices and exports stay invisible until a deadline makes them expensive.
Basic case-prep documents depend too much on manual repetition.
02Manual timelines
Paralegals still spend hours rebuilding events in Word documents and spreadsheets.
03Late surprises
Missing evidence often surfaces during deposition prep instead of earlier in intake.
04Repeated work
Preservation letters, request lists, and follow-up questions get recreated from scratch every matter.
What Gets Easier
Built for how litigation teams actually move from intake to prep.
CaseProof is most useful when it reduces manual reconstruction work and gives attorneys a clearer draft to review sooner.
Guided Intake
Standardize the record before evidence starts piling up.
Capture devices, platforms, preservation status, matter timezone, and key deadlines the same way every time.
Chronology Drafts
Build timelines from evidence instead of recreating them by hand.
Use uploaded screenshots, exports, and notes to produce a chronology draft with confidence labels and traceable source context.
Gap Analysis
Surface missing evidence early enough to do something about it.
Identify absent exports, conflicting dates, and likely holes in the record before deposition prep or motion deadlines.
Draft Work Product
Generate practical prep documents your team can refine quickly.
Start from preservation letters, evidence request checklists, and follow-up questions that reflect the matter you actually have.
Attorney Control
Keep legal judgment where it belongs: with the attorney.
Outputs are framed as drafts for review, with audit trails and review states that make the process easier to supervise.
Need More Detail?
Review the supported file types, OCR behavior, upload limits, and failure handling.
What Teams Actually Get
Output that looks like case prep, not a generic AI answer.
CaseProof is strongest when it turns scattered evidence into structured work product your team can review, challenge, and move forward with.
Review-ready timeline
Chronology Draft
Mar 12 · 8:41 PM
Instagram message sent to client
Explicit timestamp from export
Mar 13 · 9:18 AM
Screenshot forwarded to counsel
Matched across email and intake notes
Mar 14 · 11:05 AM
Preservation request likely triggered
Inferred from document trail
Missing evidence surfaced early
Gap Analysis
Critical
No device image for March 12-15 window
Potential spoliation risk before depo prep
Medium
No export from secondary work phone
Intake indicates alternate device exists
Low
Timezone mismatch in attached report
UTC conversion should be confirmed before filing
Documents counsel can refine
Draft Work Product
Letter
Preservation letter draft
Pulled from intake facts and missing-source list
Checklist
Evidence request checklist
Tailored to the matter’s known platforms
Questions
Client follow-up questions
Generated from open gaps and missing artifacts
Trust Snapshot
The answers your clients and attorneys will ask for are already documented.
CaseProof is built to help litigation teams move faster without being vague about security, AI handling, or review responsibilities.
Data Handling
No AI training on customer matter data
Matter content sent through our model providers is not used to train their public models by default.
Infrastructure
Hosted on SOC 2-backed vendors
CaseProof runs on Vercel, Supabase, Stripe, and OpenAI, with vendor posture documented in the Trust Center.
Access Controls
Row-level security and authenticated workspace access
Customer data is isolated at the database layer so users only see matters they are permitted to access.
Attorney Workflow
Outputs are drafts for review, not autopilot filings
Chronologies, gap findings, and generated documents are positioned for attorney review before use.
How CaseProof works
Five steps from intake to attorney-review drafts.
1
Open a case
Create a new case with client info, case type, jurisdiction, and key dates.
2
Complete intake
Walk through a guided checklist of devices, platforms, and preservation status.
3
Upload materials
Upload supported screenshots, PDFs, emails, reports, Word documents, and text or CSV records.
4
Generate outputs
Generate chronologies, gap analyses, and document drafts from the case data you have already organized.
5
Review and export
Review chronology and gap findings, edit document drafts, and export documents as PDF or DOCX.
Simple, transparent pricing
All plans include a 14-day free trial. No credit card required.
Solo
$99/mo
For solo practitioners and small offices.
- ✓AI chronology, gap analysis, and draft documents
- ✓PDF & DOCX export
- ✓Case audit log access
- ✓5 GB file storage
- ✓Email support
Most Popular
Small Firm
$249/mo
For firms with multiple attorneys and paralegals.
- ✓Everything in Solo
- ✓Up to 5 users
- ✓Shared workspace and team management
- ✓Review queue workflow
- ✓25 GB file storage
Litigation Team
$599/mo
For high-volume litigation practices.
- ✓Everything in Small Firm
- ✓Unlimited users
- ✓Unlimited active cases
- ✓Shared workspace and team management
- ✓Review queue workflow
- ✓100 GB file storage